Christopher Johnston wrote:
> how many characters can be stored in the comments field? (255?)

No limit.   The web app may have a width just for graphical purposes.

>
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Michael DeHaan <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     Christopher Johnston wrote:
>     > Some _possible_ ones that come to mind, although this seems to be
>     > something that would be stored in a CMDB (which sounds like cobbler
>     > could potentially be used for that).  Console information is
>     > important, but this may not be the right place to store it.
>     >
>     > system_region (US, EU, FE)
>     > system_location (NY, LON, CHI)
>     > system_datacenter (DC1, DC2)
>
>     These three we don't have.     Though they could perhaps be stored in
>     the comment field, that would not be highly structured though.
>
>
>     > system_owner (chris)
>
>     --owners means something to authz_ownership, but can otherwise be
>     abused
>     if one wants, even if not using that module.
>
>     > system_description (HP DL360 G5)
>     Every cobbler object has a --comment field that is free form right
>     now,
>     and would be good for this.
>
>
>
>     > console_host (con01)
>     > console_speed (115200)
>     > console_port (ttyS0)
>     >
>
>     These seem to be kernel arguments for setting up consoles to me,
>     and can
>     be stored in --kopts
>     >
>     > On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Dave Hatton
>     <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
>     >
>     >
>     >     > Yeah, I think so, not having the fields overwriteable also
>     makes
>     >     sense.
>     >     >
>     >     > Can folks come up with a common list of fields that would be
>     >     useful for
>     >     > this?
>     >     >
>     >     > It concerns me slightly that we are building sort of /another/
>     >     inventory
>     >     > system, though someone need not use it if they have another.
>     >     Plus the
>     >     > advantages (especially when we can do things like "cobbler
>     find"
>     >     to see
>     >     > what's in what rack (cobbler find already exists as a
>     command),
>     >     would
>     >     > definitely be worth it.
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     I'll happily collate the responses and try to get an agreed list
>     >
>     >     Dave
>     >
>     >
>     >     _______________________________________________
>     >     cobbler mailing list
>     >     [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>     <mailto:[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     >     https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > cobbler mailing list
>     > [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>     > https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler
>     >
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     cobbler mailing list
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> cobbler mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler
>   

_______________________________________________
cobbler mailing list
[email protected]
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler

Reply via email to