On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:08:43 -0400, Michael DeHaan <[email protected]> wrote: > James Cammarata wrote: >> On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:59:08 -0400, Michael DeHaan <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> virbr0 as created by libvirt is a private network, it's not a real >>> >> bridge. >> >>> If you want your guests to be reachable, you need to create a real >>> bridge on your virtual hosts and use that as the --virt-bridge in >>> >> Cobbler. >> >>> Instructions are here: >>> >>> https://fedorahosted.org/cobbler/wiki/VirtNetworkingSetupForUseWithKoan >>> >>> Making a snippet that automatically makes a bridge for the first >>> interface seems like a nice thing to do (or finding some way to do this
>>> with interface objects). >>> >>> --Michael >>> >> >> FWIW, I run xen on RHEL5.2 and this is all pretty much setup for you >> there. >> The networking scripts handle the creation of the "bridge" for you, but >> I >> believe it is still up to you to setup the sysctl/iptables correctly so >> that natting/forwarding work. It's been a few months since I got it >> setup >> though, so I forget if I had to do any voodoo, but I have my vm's hiding >> quietly behind a private network here at work (the desktop team does not >> appreciate rogue dhcp servers breaking things...) >> >> > > Yes, > > xenbr0 is a real bridge. > > If you have that, using xenbr0 is fine. I'll update the docs to make > that clearer. > > --Michael No, I'm using virbr0 on mine. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ cobbler mailing list [email protected] https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler
