Michael DeHaan wrote:
> Tom Brown wrote:
>   
>> Am i being completely blind to an obvious mistake i have made here ...
>>
>> # cobbler repo report RHEL-5.3-x86_64-base
>> repo             : RHEL-5.3-x86_64-base
>> arch             : x86_64
>> breed            : yum
>> comment          :
>> created          : Fri May  8 15:31:50 2009
>> createrepo_flags : -c cache
>> environment      : {}
>> keep updated     : True
>> mirror           : http://10.10.10.7/mirrors/redhat-es5_upd3_x86_64
>> mirror locally   : False
>> modified         : Fri May  8 15:31:50 2009
>> owners           : [u'admin']
>> priority         : 99
>> rpm list         :
>> yum options      : {}
>>
>> # cobbler profile edit --name=RHEL-5.3-x86_64 --repos='RHEL-5.3-x86_64-base'
>> repo RHEL-5.3-x86_64-base, is not defined
>>
>> thanks
>> _______________________________________________
>> cobbler mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler
>>   
>>     
>
> There were fixes for unicode things recently posted to the ML that will 
> be out today. As you personally know, repos fields are the main symptom 
> of that.
>
> You probably don't have all of those fixes applied but wait and see what 
> happens with 1.6.4
>
> --Michael
>
>   

i'll wait for 1.6.4 then - it was just odd as this worked fine on one 
box but not on the other so i guess there is something slightly 
different between the 2.

thanks

_______________________________________________
cobbler mailing list
[email protected]
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler

Reply via email to