Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 06:45:03PM +0200, Jasper Capel wrote:
>   
>> On 06/02/2009 06:06 PM, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
>>     
>>> That really only should be done for RHEL/CentOS4.  Something like this
>>> *might* fix it (I'm not that familiar with cobbler's code)?
>>>       
>> Works just as well for RHEL5 for me, also with multiple bonds. Although
>> it's not needed anymore for RHEL5, it doesn't seem to break things either.
>>
>>     
>
> I realize you may try be to keeping distro-specific switches from being
> all over the place, but it's really not needed.  Bonding module options
> in /etc/modprobe.conf are frowned upon in RHEL5.
> _______________________________________________
> cobbler mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler
>   

The code could check against $os_version if defined and if it contains 
rhel, see if it's ">=5", and also not include that in Fedora, as we can 
assume any Fedora being deployed with bonding is /very likely/ to be 
implemented the same way as RHEL 5 seeing what RHEL 5 is based on 
(Fedora 6 or 7, IIRC). It would make the templates somewhat harder to 
read, but the users aren't going to need to see it...

Perhaps part of the price of having so much automagic...

--Michael


_______________________________________________
cobbler mailing list
[email protected]
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler

Reply via email to