Jeff Schroeder wrote: > On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Christopher > Johnston<[email protected]> wrote: > >> We have a pretty larger cobbler install in our environment with a master >> gold server and dozens of slave servers that replicate daily. Has anyone >> noticed that deleted records do not get removed during the replication >> process? This is really simple to test by adding a test record, removing it >> and then replicating on the other node. In our use case we want to make >> sure the slaves keep an identical copy from master gold server. >> # cobbler version >> cobbler 1.6.6 >> > > Ditto can be said for renamed devices. On the downstream slaves they > don't get rename and in fact the new systems import strangely or not > at all because of ip/mac duplicates.
I think we sent emails around the same time, but see my other reply. The system is keyed off names, not UIDs, it should be UIDs (which we have in each object already, thankfully). > My understanding is this is a > known bug and will be eventually worked on. > Well, eventually is relative. If you mean I might eventually work on it, it may be some time -- well after 2.0 most likely. Hence why I suggested you might want to consider it for "learn to hack on Cobbler week", which I think we talked about you doing on IRC, maybe? --Michael _______________________________________________ cobbler mailing list [email protected] https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler
