On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 10:14 -0400, Michael DeHaan wrote: > On 07/08/2009 05:40 AM, Léon Keijser wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 11:13 -0400, Michael DeHaan wrote: > > > > > Hmm, can you help isolate when we do and do not need to add "-s sha" ? > > > > > > > Host: Fedora 11 > > Arch: x86_64 > > Version: cobbler-1.6.6-1.fc11.x86_64 > > > > Import RHEL 5.3 x86_64: OK > > System install: FAIL > > After '-s sha': OK > > > > Import CentOS 5.3 x86_64: OK > > System install: FAIL > > After '-s sha': OK > > > > Import Fedora 10 x86_64: OK > > System install: OK > > After '-s sha': Not necessary > > > > Import RHEL 5.3 i386: OK > > System install: FAIL > > After '-s sha': OK > > > > I was unable to install a Fedora11 system since it kept complaining > > about the disk not being found (i tried hda, sda and xva) so i gave up > > on that one. > > > > I haven't yet removed the F10 distro so if there's something more you > > want me to test, let me know. > > > > > > Excellent. > > So this seems to imply that if we add "-s sha" to all of our > createrepos, life will be good .. provided of course older yum accepts > "-s sha" ... > > I'm guessing "Not necessary" doesn't mean that it fails if you add it?
I haven't tried that (i will do so today) yet. The system installed fine without me having to create the repo again using the -s sha params. > > If so, that's an easy fix, which is good for us! > > If you haven't already opened a Trac item on this at > fedorahosted.org/cobbler, please do, so we can make sure to get this > in for the next release, which is /probably/ 2.0, but given this may > be annoying to some folks, it may warrant just one more 1.6.X in the > next few weeks. I'll do so later today. thanks, -- Léon _______________________________________________ cobbler mailing list [email protected] https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler
