On 09/28/2009 02:12 PM, Bryan Schneiders wrote: > cobbler-1.6.6-1.fc10.i386 > > I just did the same thing. I haven't run reposync again yet because even if > I restrict it to just the repository in question (using the old name or the > new one?) that could be an expensive command if it does have to download the > entire repository in question from scratch. > > Neither the old name nor the new one are present in /var/www/cobbler/ after > the repo rename, but the rest of my repositories are. If the data wasn't > deleted, where could I look to verify it still exists? >
I think you mean '/var/www/cobbler/repo_mirror/', right? I'm sure you do. That sounds like a bug. Anyway, run "cobbler reposync" and things should be good to go, in case. Though, true, we don't users to have to do that. Anyway, all new development is being done against 2.0, so if you can test to see whether 2.0 removes your repo (or does not rename it), that would be helpful. One idea might be to keep an internal field for the repo names and not have them named after the repo... and the same for the imports. We already do this for imports today (distro imports, not repos... which work differently) by storing the address of the tree in the distro. If we did the same for repos, we could keep the names auto-generated and it wouldn't be required that we rename them. --Michael _______________________________________________ cobbler mailing list [email protected] https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler
