Michael DeHaan wrote: > Bryan Schneiders wrote: >> Many of my cobbler profiles that were created before I upgraded to 2.0 now >> list their parent distribution as "<<inherit>>" with no other visible >> reference in the console or web interface as to which distribution they're >> "inheriting". However if I view their generated kickstart they all still >> know which distribution to use. I assume it's being stored in a variable >> that isn't visible from "cobbler profile report" or the web interface? >> > > This could be a subprofile, which means it is parented off of another > profile, rather than a distribution. I'm guessing that is what you > have, in which case, that would be normal. >> Are there any consequences I should be aware of if I try to use "cobbler >> profile edit --name=... --distro=..." to change "<<inherit>>" to match the >> parent I think goes with each profile? >> >> Is this behaviour a bug? >> > > Not if you have subprofiles, which I suspect you do. >
That's fine and makes sense. How would I find out who the parent of a subprofile is? In 1.6 I think this was displayed in the same part of the interface as "<<inherit>>" is now, like on the profiles page of the web interface it would show the parent as either a distribution or another profile. Now it only shows the parent if it's a distribution and doesn't tell you who the parent is if it's another profile. _______________________________________________ cobbler mailing list [email protected] https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler
