My guess is this probably has something to do with the SHA256 changes that went into yum etc around that time. Fedora 10's tooling probably wouldn't have been able to generate it and then your F12 clients would require that metadata in yum.
Cheers, Devan On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 1:47 AM, Bill McGonigle <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11/19/2009 07:48 PM, Bill McGonigle wrote: >> I'm trying to get a f12 repo up under cobbler (on an f10 box at the moment). > > Same box is now upgraded to Fedora 11, reposync was run again, and now > the repos work fine both from f12 and from f11 updating to f12. > > So, it seems the f10 versions of the tools can't handle some aspect of > the f12 packages. > > -Bill > > -- > Bill McGonigle, Owner > BFC Computing, LLC > http://bfccomputing.com/ > Telephone: +1.603.448.4440 > Email, IM, VOIP: [email protected] > VCard: http://bfccomputing.com/vcard/bill.vcf > Social networks: bill_mcgonigle/bill.mcgonigle > _______________________________________________ > cobbler mailing list > [email protected] > https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler > -- Devan Goodwin <[email protected]> http://rm-rf.ca _______________________________________________ cobbler mailing list [email protected] https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler
