On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Javier Palacios <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:48 AM, James Cammarata <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Duffie Cooley <[email protected]> wrote: >>> What I have done so far. >>> >>> I have a debian host running cobbler 2.1.0 from the debian repo. I went >>> into /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/cobbler and copied all the .py >>> to .py.orig. Then I uncommented all of the debian specific stuff in >>> actions-import and codes. Then I pycompile and rerun my import. Now when >> >> Something's wrong here, you shouldn't have to uncomment anything, as >> we moved imports to a module structure and added full support for >> debian/ubuntu distros (newer ones, at least) in 2.1.0. I'd recommend >> grabbing the latest from git and trying that out, making sure to >> uninstall what you've got on that machine so there are no conflicts. >> > > Looking at the current git, I see both the manage_import_*py and the > action_import.py. > Probably, Duffie did uncomment things on action_import, which is > actually never used. > Is probably a good idea to move the action_import (and probably > others) to the obsolete > directory, to avoid this kind of confussions.
Yeah, it had been left in during the transition, but since the module stuff appears to be going so well I think we can remove it now. I'll take care of that. _______________________________________________ cobbler mailing list [email protected] https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler
