It doesn't make much sense to me, because upstream apps aren't supposed to know about the package manager that installed them.
i.e. Apache doesn't complain about RPM new files, and I can't think of any other app that does. On Friday, January 27, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Mann, Owen wrote: > > What does the list think of this RFE? > > > - make `cobbler check` complain about .rpmnew files > > > > > > > > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael DeHaan > Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 9:29 AM > To: cobbler mailing list > Subject: Re: cobbler xmlrpc subnet/netmask issue > > > > > > That's all templated out, check /etc/cobbler and you should find a template > that references the old value, and probably a ".rpmnew" version that does > not, that needed to replace the old one. > > > > > > > > Make sure you preserve any edits you might have made to the original template. > > > > > > > > > ******************************************************* > This message (including any files transmitted with it) may contain > confidential and/or proprietary information, is the property of Interactive > Data Corporation and/or its subsidiaries, and is directed only to the > addressee(s). If you are not the designated recipient or have reason to > believe you received this message in error, please delete this message from > your system and notify the sender immediately. An unintended recipient's > disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this message or any attachments > is prohibited and may be unlawful. > ******************************************************* > _______________________________________________ > cobbler mailing list > [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) > https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler > >
_______________________________________________ cobbler mailing list [email protected] https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler
