Let's do it now with this release.

Dual-maintaince of separate ways to do it leads to certain paths not being well 
tested, at it sounds like we already have
that problem in some corners.

Folks with issues about what virt-install can't do can then take it up on the 
virt-install lists, and cobbler can just
be (for virtualization) the adapter layer that instructs virt-install what to 
do (obviously keeping the reinstall and config
stuff it does as well).

If bugs arise, we can fix them.

Make it so.


On Monday, February 6, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Cole Robinson wrote:

> On 02/06/2012 03:46 PM, Michael DeHaan wrote:
> > Hmm.
> > 
> > Another blasphemous thought might be to just shell out to the qemu and Xen
> > command line tools directly if preserving these options are important.
> > 
> > Someone would have to do the legwork of making it though :)
> 
> Well, like I said before, I'd be okay with changing the patch to preserve the
> original code if 'import virtinst' still works, and my new code would be how
> koan provisions libvirt VMs on fedora17 and newer. Presumably people on RHEL5
> are updating cobbler but not virtinst, so they will be using the same old code
> paths.
> 
> This would also mean I have to worry less about regressing everyone's systems,
> and only regressing for people that are also upgrading their host to another
> major OS (say f16->f17)
> 
> However I would then recommend yall come up with a timetable of when to drop
> the old virtinst code for good, and make the virt-install impl the canonical
> way to provision libvirt guests, just to save yourself headaches. That would
> give you time to get out ample warnings, announce it loudly, etc.
> 
> - Cole 

_______________________________________________
cobbler mailing list
[email protected]
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler

Reply via email to