On 30.05.2014 [15:59:17 -0500], Tim Skirvin wrote: > Dan Alvarez <[email protected]> writes: > > > I read through the thread back in 2012, but it didn't look to have resulted > > in a final conclusion. I'm happily using cobbler to set up my DHCP and > > DNS for the cluster. It all works fine for my regular ports, but I'm also > > using provisioning through cobbler for my ipmi interfaces (DHCP and DNS) > > but I loose my DHCP leases on those after some time. > > > Why don't the dhcp entries persist even with netboot-enabled set to False? > > I'm actually curious about the inverse - why do some dhcp entries > persist even with netboot-enabled set to False? It's not consistent, and > it seems to have something to do with whether the host is set to bonding > or not. > > Is there some additional dhcp templating work that can be done to > let both of us have what we want? > > (I'm running 2.7.0.)
Are the interfaces in question set as "static"? Or, rather, *not* set as "static"? Thanks, Nish _______________________________________________ cobbler mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler
