In response to Bob Righter and Brandon Percival's discussion on the
status of Lilian's Meadowlark in Colorado, I thought I'd add some
information on "Eastern Meadowlarks" from the perspective of the
Colorado Bird Records Committee (CBRC).  There are currently 10 accepted
records of Eastern Meadowlark in Colorado, 6 from the South Platte River
drainage and 4 from the Arkansas River drainage.
 
The Lilian's race of Eastern Meadowlark (as currently recognized)
[Sturnella magna lilianae] is known to regularly occur northeastwards to
northeastern New Mexico.  The subspecies differs in the field from the
nominate magna by having more white outer tail feathers (rectrix 3-6
compared to 4-6 on magna), less yellow on the throat, a bit of a
difference in call note, and slight differences in song (somewhat
jumbled than magna and somewhat reminiscent of Western Meadowlark).
There are mensural differences between the two as well that cannot be
judged in the field.  In 2003, Michael Patten discovered a singing bird
near the Campo Lesser Prairie Chicken lek in Baca County and was
distinctively able to preclude magna and Western Meadowlark based on
those traits.  The subspecies was documented from the same location
again in 2005, where up to three birds were present on territory.
Reports of Lilian's continue from that general area, although the CBRC
has not received any details on the continued presence of the race
there.  However, in the summer of 2006, a male and female Lilian's were
discovered in Colorado City, Pueblo County by David Silverman and the
CBRC accepted the birds as Lilian's based on documentations noting the
more extensive white tail feathering and difference in call notes.
Prior to the Baca County observation, the only other accepted Eastern
Meadowlark record for southern Colorado (within the Arkansas River
drainage system) was from Prowers County in 1992.  There was no
indication of what subspecies that bird may have pertained to.
 
All of the 6 Eastern Meadowlarks found in northeastern Colorado are
believed to have been of the nominate magna based on plumage and
vocalization criteria, with records stemming from Logan, Weld, and
Larimer counties.  Thus at this point, one may suggest that birds in the
Arkansas system are of Lilian's and those of the South Platte are magna,
which the data thus far seem to indicate, with the caveat that we don't
know what the race of the Prowers bird was.
 
Bob referred to the very recent excellent paper that was published in
the Auk that sequenced mitochondrial genes of three "yellow-breasted
meadowlarks" (magna, lilianae, and Western [neglecta].  The data
strongly supported that the three meadowlarks are of historically
isolated lineages and should be differentiated to the species level
(Barker et al. 2008).  I agree with Bob that as the paper was published
in the Auk, the journal of the American Ornithologists' Union (AOU), I
would predict that the July issue of the decisions of the AOU Checklist
Committee will split Lilian's from Eastern, but I've been wrong on
predictions before...  :).
 
I hope this clarifies and has not confused folks.
 
Larry Semo
Chair, Colorado Bird Records Committee
 
Barker, F.K., A.J. Vandergon, and S.M. Lanyon.  2008. Assessment of
Species Limits among Yellow-breasted Meadowlarks (Sturnella Spp.) Using
Mitochondrial and Sex-Linked Markers. Auk 125(4): 869-879.


________________________________

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Brandon Percival
Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 4:15 PM
To: Cobirds
Subject: [cobirds] Re: New Meadowlark species ?


I'm fairly sure there are a few recent accepted records of "Lilian's"
Meadowlark in Colorado.  I documented "Lilian's" Meadowlark from Baca
County and Pueblo County, and these have been accepted by the Colorado
Birds Records Committee.  The Pueblo County birds were photographed with
food, probably indicating breeding at the location, since there were two
birds present.

Brandon Percival
Pueblo West, CO

--- On Sun, 2/1/09, Robert Righter <[email protected]> wrote:


        From: Robert Righter <[email protected]>
        Subject: [cobirds] New Meadowlark species ?
        To: "Cobirds" <[email protected]>
        Date: Sunday, February 1, 2009, 3:28 PM
        
        
        Hi:
        It seems like we're still agonizing if that odd looking goose
is a  
        Canada or Cackling and now in the recent Auk, Vol. 125, number
4,  
        there is  an article suggesting that, not based on looks, but on

        genetics that "Lilian's" Meadowlark is significantly different
from  
        the Eastern and Western Meadowlarks. If the AOU Check-list
Committee  
        agrees then we can no long just drive by and tick off a
meadowlark as  
        just a Western.  This will be another one of those ID toughies.
Songs  
        from a Eastern Meadowlarks will now be questioned as, "could
that have  
        been Lilian's" ? Good gracious, all of this is potentially
upsetting  
        news for those of us who like to quickly put labels on birds.
        As far as I know there is no accepted records for Lilian's
Meadowlark  
        for Colorado, however its known northern range, based on
specimens,  
        includes the southern part of the northeast quadrant of New
Mexico, so  
        conceivable with no more than a flap, flap, it could be in
Colorado,  
        maybe it is even here now?. Potentially it could find in the  
        grasslands of southern Colorado favorable, but more potentially
the  
        southern grasslands east of the Divide could have more to offer,

        particularly in quantity.
        
        Bob Righter
        
        Denver CO
        
        
          
        






--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Colorado Birds" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cobirds?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to