Gary, Christian, Chris (if you are listening), et al.,
I totally agree with Christian on this one.  eBird is a fantastic source of 
information and should be useful for Gary's desired outcome (original email 
below), however I must point out something that has been frustrating me for the 
last few weeks on eBird.  A personal desire of mine would be to have a calendar 
of all the possible species in my area of interest marked with the date of 
their 
highest count or highest number of checklists reporting that species so I could 
say to myself, "Oh yeah, it is time to go looking for murrelets!" or "Oh yeah! 
It's jaeger week! (similar to Discovery Channel's Shark Week)"  The user 
interface of histograms is great if you have a specific bird you are hunting 
for, but when you want to ask yourself "Where should I go birding, and what 
should I look for this time of year?" that question is not easily answered from 
the histograms without a lot of scrolling or without diving into a single 
species account.  One may argue that you can look at the high counts data in 
chronological order, but chronological order includes year, so the earliest 
record in terms of years is listed first.  If the data was ordered by month 
then 
day and year was ignored (Jan 1st of any year comes before Sept 13th of any 
year), then it would be much more useful.  


The important part here to me is that the expert user of eBird who is an expert 
birder in that location can easily pare down the list in their head to get the 
information they want.  However, the inexperienced birder/eBirder doesn't have 
that internal database to readily pull from.  This may be a 
recently-moved-to-the-area birder, a novice, or a person who just hasn't had 
enough interest until now to look for those specific dates (my personal boat).  
I personally glean this kind of information from posts others have made to 
COBirds: the best time for Sabine's Gulls in Northern Colorado is the second 
and 
third weeks of September, the best time for murrelets is the first or second 
week of November (I actually forget), the best time for nocturnally migrating 
Upland Sandpipers is the last week of August or the first week of September.  
But wouldn't it be nice if we just had that on a calendar?  Sure I could use my 
personal calendar to put the date of the high counts or most checklists 
submitted with that species, but then it wouldn't alter with time as more data 
gets entered.  


So how many of you know that the best week to find Arctic Loon, Whooping Crane, 
Ancient Murrelet, and Common Ground Dove in Colorado is the second week of 
November?  (This took some time and plenty of scrolling for me to figure this 
out)  It is somewhat odd to think about it that way, but why not have all those 
species on your radar when you are out or thinking about going out birding?  It 
will make you stop for those second glances at birds which you may think are 
just the usuals (Common Loon, Sandhill Crane, some sort of diving duck or 
grebe, 
or your local doves).  These are the kinds of data that I think help people 
become better birdwatchers (okay... I should show my true colors, better 
listers).  


This is similar to the kind of information Dave Leatherman (CSU entomologist 
and 
birdwatcher) has stored in his head (on paper?) about insect species occurence 
in Colorado and which birds eat those insects.  He knows when those insects 
will 
be hatching or invading (pardon my ignorance on the subject) so he can then 
find 
those trees most suited to hosting that insect and thus find the birds that 
love 
that as a food source at that time of year.  This is different thinking than I 
believe most birdwatchers (personal conjecture only) have about finding 
species.  I think the bulk of birdwatchers leave a little (a lot?) to chance or 
just go out looking for some birds for their own enjoyment.  Sure one may 
monitor COBirds and say, "Hey, they are seeing Little Gulls this week, maybe I 
could find one of those here at my local lake instead of driving two hours to 
see that one..." but what if there isn't that kind of thought process or there 
just haven't been any sightings of that species recently to spark your own 
interest?  This calendar would turn on your personal radar to that possibility. 
 


So, I went to Science Pipes (sciencepipes.org) to try to build my own eBird 
data 
stream to make this calendar a reality.  It was not possible to build this kind 
of data stream, because you can only use one species at a time (from what I 
could tell), and there was no way to output to a calendar or a text list of 
dates of high counts or highest number of checklists submitted for that 
species.  I just couldn't see a way to program this into the Science Pipes 
output and there is no batch method to loop through all the species to make 
this 
possible either.  If I had access to the data, I could theoretically program 
this myself with a loop or just a database query, but that isn't possible.  I 
envision the possibility of a form where you can customize this loop to just 
your target area (be it state, county, or hotspot) over your time period of 
interest (all year, just fall migration, just your one week visit) and maybe 
even limit by target species (hopefully greater than five species is possible). 
 
Then one gets back a calendar showing what the best times to go looking for 
that 
species are maybe even with a little padding on each side (depending on that 
species's histogram's standard deviation).  


Some may argue with me about the best way to view the data, but with a calendar 
we are then getting away from having to know what species to look for in the 
large dataset and getting to just viewing something easy to digest.  I would 
even be fine with a "This week in birding your area" kind of RSS feed that 
sends 
you a weekly breakdown of what you might want to expect in your area according 
to historical records.  We could also easily pull genus or family level data 
for 
when southerly shorebird migration starts and plot it on the calendar.  (Yes I 
know that is hard to distinguish, so please don't argue about that, it is for 
example purposes only)  Yes, we are puppets to the data, but this is better 
than 
nothing.  I am noticing more and more that the experts are grabbing hold of 
eBird, but maybe the more inexperienced birders are not yet and maybe they 
never 
will have that level of interest, but this could make it more useful to the 
average birder.  


Just my two cents.  Maybe you are ready to clock me for wasting all of your 
time, but I blame you for reading this far... ;)  Just kidding.

 Bryan Guarente
Instructional Designer
The COMET Program
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research
Boulder, CO




________________________________
From: Christian Nunes <[email protected]>
To: CObirds List <[email protected]>
Sent: Wed, September 29, 2010 10:17:04 AM
Subject: RE: [cobirds] Colorado Migrations

 Gary et al.,
 
There is a place where tremendous amounts of data have been complied and are 
there ready to be analyzed by anyone. Amazing amounts of information can be 
mined from this single source. 

 
www.ebird.org
 
In ebird, you can "View and Explore Data." There are options that will help 
answer your query. You can look at bar charts of occurrences of bird species in 
particular regions, states, counties or even single birding spots. This helped 
me just last week when I wanted to remember the probability of occurrence of 
the 
three jaeger species in CO. I knew the order had been worked out, but couldn't 
find the specific place in my CFO Journals where Tony Leukering had described 
this. So I hopped on ebird and queried the seasonal occurrences of birds in CO, 
and it clarified my hazy memory of the order of jaeger occurrences 
(Long-tailed=Aug/Sept, Pomarine=Sept-Nov, Parasitic =Oct/Nov). 

 
Speculation on seasonal distributions of birds has always been a large part of 
the intrigue of birding for me. But, the knowledge base always came from the 
advice of other birders or my own records (not always, I mean never, in an 
organized place ripe for analysis!). There is a HUGE amount of data out there, 
covering decades of effort from thousands of field observers. Growing up in RI, 
there was a published list of the birds of RI with bar graphs depicting their 
seasonal occurrences. This booklet was invaluable, but I have rarely seen 
anything like it since. The work that went into publishing this little booklet, 
synthesizing data from the past 100 yrs, must have been tremendous. I think it 
was the hard work of a few dedicated data-freaks that was the inspiration for 
ebird. Now instead of waiting for a few ambitious individuals to spend half 
their lives synthesizing piles of data into a neat and useful presentation that 
is published once and then never revised, I can just go online and click a few 
buttons and I will receive pretty much the same information plus some. 

 
Of course there are limitations to ebird. It depends on observers entering 
accurate data. There are still those piles of 100 yr old records that need to 
be 
entered if we want to look at long-term trends. I have no doubt that this work 
will be completed at some point in the future, and for now, we still have an 
incredibly useful tool for making insights on bird populations, distributions 
and temporal occurrences. 

 
Have fun,

Christian Nunes
Boulder, CO
[email protected]
http://www.flickr.com/photos/christian_nunes/



 
> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:52:54 -0700
> Subject: [cobirds] Colorado Migrations
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> 
> Is there historical data/graph out there that shows Colorado migration
> periods/species occurrence? For example:
> 
> 10% (early migrants) of Colorado early spring migrants occurs between
> Apr-x and May-x dates
> 80% (most migrants) of Colorado spring migration occurs between May-x
> and May-y dates
> 10% (late migrants) of Colorado late spring migrants occurs between
> May-x and June-x dates
> 
> Same for Fall migration.
> 
> If we have that data then what species fall in early, most, late
> windows?
> 
> Don't want generalizations--be interested in seeing what data shows.
> 
> Thanks
> Gary Lefko, Nunn
> http://ColoradoBirder.ning.com/ -- Home of the "Nunn Guy"
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>"Colorado Birds" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>[email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
>http://groups.google.com/group/cobirds?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Colorado Birds" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cobirds?hl=en.



      

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Colorado Birds" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cobirds?hl=en.

Reply via email to