Well said!
Nick Komar and I searched extensively for the bird yesterday late afternoon 
into the evening without luck. I would strongly urge other birders who are 
able, to pursue refinding this bird, however! (There are two Sanderlings, 
lots of Stilt Sandpipers, a Pectoral Sandpiper, and four Black Terns as 
well out there.) Thank you for your great finds and contributions to the 
Colorado birding community, Josh!

*The birds are happy, and so am I,*
*~Caleb Alons, Larimer County*

On Tuesday, September 8, 2020 at 10:34:28 PM UTC-6 Josh Bruening wrote:

> All,
>
> First, let me report a Red Knot at Fossil Creek Reservoir that I found at 
> noon today.  Luckily this bird was seen by many people.  Better photos were 
> taken than the ones I included on my Ebird checklist.  
>
> Second, there is some question to the veracity of my report of a Ruff 
> earlier this morning at Timnath Reservoir.  I would like to put out there 
> first that I am more than willing to go to school on my identification of a 
> Ruff vs. Buff-Breasted Sandpiper.  Therefore, I would love to defer to the 
> experts.  However, several things were brought up that questioned the 
> sighting.  Mainly, the tertial feathers.  Also, the bill was called into 
> question.  Before I mount my defense, I would like to acknowledge that I 
> have exactly one experience each with both of these specie.  
>
> The reason that I called this a Ruff was the crazy dark head feathers and 
> thick bill.  Also, the bill was thick at the base and bi-colored from what 
> I could see.  The bill was also longer than what I would expect from a 
> Buff-breasted.  Buff-breasted bills are short and dainty.  Beyond the the 
> bill and the head feathers was the fact that it was larger than the 
> Killdeer and Lesser Yellowlegs nearby.  I'm not sure how just the tertials 
> is a good enough indicator to species at that point.  A Buff-breasted 
> should be far smaller.  Again, in a time of molt, I'm not clear as to why 
> the tertials are the determining factor here.  I don't usually "defend" a 
> sighting but am at odds with this one.  Further, if this was "just" a bird 
> that got beat up or stained by the storm.  I don't get it.  This bird 
> looked like a Muppet.  If that storm was equivalent to a 15 round bout with 
> Mike Tyson, I get it.  But it didn't look like it to me.
>
> I truly hope this bird stuck around and can be refound.  Truthfully, I 
> don't care what it is.  I think it's a Ruff.  Either way, it's a great bird 
> for Larimer County in the fall.
>
> Bird is the word!
>
> Josh Bruening
> Fort Collins
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Colorado Birds" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cobirds/e0c88d1e-c306-4b93-b23e-4b748b21676an%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to