Hi all

I'll just add most of what we have lost in terms of bird populations are 
anthropogenic (human) in nature primarily habitat loss and degradation. 
Refresher stories about 3 billion birds lost:

   - https://abcbirds.org/3-billion-birds/
   - 
   
https://abcbirds.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Bird-Decline-paper_Science-formatted_final.pdf
   - https://www.birds.cornell.edu/home/bring-birds-back/
   - 
   
https://www.audubon.org/news/north-america-has-lost-more-1-4-birds-last-50-years-new-study-says
   
Thanks, Gary Lefko, Nunn
http://www.friendsofthepawneegrassland.org/
https://www.inaturalist.org/projects/birds-and-more-of-the-pawnee-national-grassland

On Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 5:22:09 PM UTC-7 [email protected] wrote:

> As a member of The Bird Conservancy of the Rockies, plus a volunteer for 
> them at their Barr Lake State Park banding station, I have just one thing 
> to say:
>
> BIRDS ARE *NOT* MORE ADAPTABLE THAN SOME PEOPLE GIVE THEM CREDIT FOR. 
>
> Billions of birds have been lost because they are NOT adapting.
>
> Susan Rosine
> Brighton, Adams County
>
> On Thu, Dec 9, 2021, 4:40 PM SeEttaM <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Wow, I had to reread what I wrote but I cannot fathom how it was 
>> misconstrued to include recommended that "...we harass the process of 
>> bringing in a greater supply of electricity...." and effectively costing 
>> taxpayers more money!  Really, this is I what I asked, "..I hope many 
>> will take a look and intervene as needed to try to protect the birds we 
>> still have. "
>>
>>
>> While I don't know what to think about that I do disagree with Mr. 
>> Reeser's statement, "Birds are more adaptable than some people give them 
>> credit for."  I'm not sure how many Colorado birders are aware of the very 
>> real of extinction of Lesser Prairie Chickens from southeast Colorado which 
>> has been identified as in part due to gas and oil activity: "The lesser 
>> prairie-chicken population, which once numbered in the hundreds of 
>> thousands, has dwindled across its historical range by an estimated 90%, 
>> “due largely to habitat loss and fragmentation,” USFWS said, with oil and 
>> gas activity contributing to the decline".  
>> Some of the issues with gas and oil activity that have caused the decline 
>> of these Lesser Prairie Chickens are similar to what expansion of electric 
>> utility lines would bring.  I don't consider the risk of expiration of this 
>> species to be a "small price to pay." 
>>
>> I certainly hope that more level headed consideration be given to this 
>> issue.  I am a strong supporter of accountability and that I believe that 
>> utilizing companies need to be held accountable for their actions that 
>> might cause serious damage to vital bird habitat. And that will only happen 
>> when those of us who are serious about bird conservation intervene (fyi, 
>> before I get misconstrued again that does not imply that this project has 
>> to be stopped or that the company should be harassed.)
>>
>> Just an addition piece of info, other interests such as the cultural 
>> advocates are intervening to avoid this project being harmful to their 
>> interests in Eastern Colorado.  
>>
>> SeEtta Moss
>> Canon City 
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 9, 2021, 9:09 AM Rick Reeser <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Cobirders: In response to the post about Xcel expanding their power 
>>> network, I have several responses:
>>>
>>> 1.       You can’t have your cake and eat it, too. You can’t be a 
>>> consumer of significantly more electricity (in contrast to using fossil 
>>> fuels for cars, furnace, etc.) without supporting the electrical supply 
>>> chain. The electrical supply chain comes with some sacrifices, just like 
>>> oil drilling comes with some negatives.
>>>
>>> 2.        If we harass the process of bringing in a greater supply of 
>>> electricity, it comes with adding a significant cost to the end product.  
>>> Remember, Xcel has to pass onto us the economic costs of this $2 billion 
>>> project. Do we want it more than that?
>>>
>>> 3.       Birds are far more adaptable than some people give them credit 
>>> for.  It’s like when I fill my feeders. The birds leave for a short time, 
>>> but they will be back where food can be found. Yes, construction is a 
>>> short-term annoyance, but the long-term benefit makes it worth it. And, the 
>>> actual loss of habitat is likely to be quite small.
>>>
>>> 4.       The addition of more power lines in remote areas that are not 
>>> known for their tourism potential seems like a small sacrifice to pay for 
>>> getting the electricity we need.  California has had numerous fires and 
>>> power outages due to demanding too high of electrical consumption before 
>>> having the infrastructure to support it. Some of their fires were started 
>>> by aging electrical systems and their power outages- that were almost daily 
>>> when I was there this past year- were quite disruptive. We need the 
>>> electrical infrastructure to move forward to prevent these types of things 
>>> from happening.
>>>
>>> 5.       Will these power stations and lines actually kill lots of birds 
>>> or make them move permanently far away.  I doubt it. Our cars kill lots of 
>>> birds, but we don’t propose eliminating cars because of that- we drive with 
>>> greater caution instead.
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> We need to work with Xcel on this project to minimize the harm to the 
>>> habitat, not work against them. Offering to work with someone is far more 
>>> effective than working against them.
>>>
>>> Rick Reeser 
>>>
>>> Milliken
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, December 8, 2021 at 11:00:55 AM UTC-7 SeEtta wrote:
>>>
>>>> I just found mapping by Excel of their 'Colorado Power Pathway' of new 
>>>> substations and  giant transmission lines that are proposed to cut through 
>>>> eastern Colorado including in or near some very important bird habitat 
>>>> including Chico Basin. Are any conservation groups or birding groups that 
>>>> concern themselves with protecting vital bird habitat monitoring this?  As 
>>>> the conservation chair for Arkansas  Valley Audubon Society I am now going 
>>>> to try to send comments on their incursions into areas that we service buy 
>>>> there is a lot of Eastern Colorado that will is north of our area that 
>>>> will 
>>>> be impacted by that this major expansion by Excel. Given all the negative 
>>>> impacts on the birds we all love to watch I hope many will take a look and 
>>>> intervene as needed to try to protect the birds we still have.   Here is 
>>>> the maps and basic info I have found: 
>>>> https://www.coloradospowerpathway.com/project-description/
>>>>
>>>> SeEtta Moss 
>>>> Canon City 
>>>>
>>> -- 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Colorado Birds" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/cobirds?hl=en?hl=en
>>> * All posts should be signed with the poster's full name and city. 
>>> Include bird species and location in the subject line when appropriate
>>> * Join Colorado Field Ornithologists https://cobirds.org/CFO/Membership/
>>> --- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "Colorado Birds" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cobirds/f5ca2054-ead5-4d22-8e0c-ed6b9aeb0ddbn%40googlegroups.com
>>>  
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cobirds/f5ca2054-ead5-4d22-8e0c-ed6b9aeb0ddbn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>> -- 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Colorado Birds" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/cobirds?hl=en?hl=en
>> * All posts should be signed with the poster's full name and city. 
>> Include bird species and location in the subject line when appropriate
>> * Join Colorado Field Ornithologists https://cobirds.org/CFO/Membership/
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Colorado Birds" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>>
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cobirds/CAAUvckpRdOQqTvfJ3v9b%2B0k58x6rqhqcxcZkELccFWPD%3DM13XA%40mail.gmail.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cobirds/CAAUvckpRdOQqTvfJ3v9b%2B0k58x6rqhqcxcZkELccFWPD%3DM13XA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Colorado Birds" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cobirds?hl=en?hl=en
* All posts should be signed with the poster's full name and city. Include bird 
species and location in the subject line when appropriate
* Join Colorado Field Ornithologists https://cobirds.org/CFO/Membership/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Colorado Birds" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cobirds/83202198-47d6-49d4-bf64-011174cf323en%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to