Hi,

On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 17:15 +0200, Nicolas Palix wrote:
> +    echo ' The semantic patch that makes this change is available'
> +    echo " in $FILE."
> +    echo ''
> +    echo ' More information about semantic patching is available at'
> +    echo ' http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/'
> +    echo ''
> +
> +    $SPATCH -D $MODE -very_quiet -sp_file $COCCI $OPT -dir $DIR

Here I've got output:

/usr/lib/coccinelle/spatch: unknown option `-very_quiet'.
Usage: spatch -sp_file <SP> <infile> [-o <outfile>] [-iso_file <iso>] [options]
Options are:
[...]


I use ubuntu Lucid 10.04 as said in Documentation/coccinelle.txt.

$ LANG=C apt-cache policy coccinelle
[...]
  Installed: 0.2.0.deb-1ubuntu2
[...]


If I delete -very_quiet then It runs OK, but output is not ommited:

init_defs_builtins: /usr/share/coccinelle/standard.h
HANDLING: /home/vasya/dev/linux-next/security/min_addr.c
HANDLING: /home/vasya/dev/linux-next/security/keys/proc.c
HANDLING: /home/vasya/dev/linux-next/security/keys/keyring.c
HANDLING: /home/vasya/dev/linux-next/security/keys/gc.c
HANDLING: /home/vasya/dev/linux-next/security/keys/process_keys.c
HANDLING: /home/vasya/dev/linux-next/security/keys/request_key_auth.c
[...]


> +if [ "$COCCI" = "" ] ; then
> +    for f in `find $srctree/scripts/coccinelle/ -name '*.cocci' -type f | 
> sort`; do
> +     coccinelle $f $srctree;
> +    done
> +else
> +    coccinelle $COCCI $srctree
> +fi

I think it is more usefull to use $M instead of $srctree to run simple
'make coccicheck'.
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.diku.dk/mailman/listinfo/cocci
(Web access from inside DIKUs LAN only)

Reply via email to