On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Julia Lawall <[email protected]> wrote:
> Here is a solution that stays at the SmPL level rather than resorting to
> looking at the AST...
Couldn't test the first solution you give. Maybe some missing ocaml
libraries. The second one is a very clever solution :-)
Unfortunately, it still misses one case:
if ((a) && (!b) && c)
return 2;
It will not put parenthesis on "c".
> The important point is the rule three, that ignores &&s where the left
> argument is another &&.
I think that case does not work exactly because of this rule :-\.
Lucas De Marchi
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.diku.dk/mailman/listinfo/cocci
(Web access from inside DIKUs LAN only)
