On Mon, 27 Sep 2010, Jerome Benoit wrote:
> Le Sun, 26 Sep 2010 00:48:38 +0200,
> Jesper Louis Andersen a écrit :
>
> > However, I do not know the overhead in
> > maintaining and applying "foreign" patches for them.
>
> There's probably some overhead. But it should really be put in balance
> with the potential benefits.
>
> Cocci is a wonderful C code analyser, well thought for semantics
> analysis, well thought for easy understanding to people used to
> pacthes. Do not forget that is represent the missing gap between
> pure static code analysis and pure semantic programming. I do not know
> another FOSS tools doing that. Given that, I fail to see what will be
> wrong to give more public exposure to the development.
>
> Unfortunately, I have to much on my plate to setup a SCM and
> automatically synchronize each tarball release with it to
> demonstrate to the cocci team that the benefits are greater
> than the overhead ... but it's up to someone here with a plate
> less filled than me to do it :)
Someone in my research group has volunteered to take care of this.
julia
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.diku.dk/mailman/listinfo/cocci
(Web access from inside DIKUs LAN only)
