Hi,
Le jeudi 25 novembre 2010 à 18:55 +0100, Julia Lawall a écrit :
> On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
> > Thanks for your interest in Coccinelle. I had thought that in the special
> > case where the change is only on the variable that it would be able to
> > make the transformation. Ie, if the second rule were rather written with:
> >
> > Packet
> > - p
> > + *p = SCMalloc(SIZE_OF_PACKET)
> > ;
> >
> > But I see that this is not working either. I will look into it and hope
> > to find a solution today or tomorrow.
>
> It turned out to be a little more subtle than expected. I will hope to
> have a working solution soon.
Working on the same code modification, I did not found a way to treat
the case where I've got multiple Packet variable.
If I use :
@rule1@
identifier p;
identifier func;
identifier fdl;
@@
func(...) {
...
Packet p;
<...
(
- p.fdl
+ p->fdl
|
- &(p)
+ p
)
...>
}
on a file where there is :
Packet p1;
Packet p2;
then the modification is only done on p1.
Is there a way to treat all variables at once ?
BR,
--
Eric Leblond <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.diku.dk/mailman/listinfo/cocci
(Web access from inside DIKUs LAN only)
