Hah, typical of me not to think of the obvious solution. Thanks for the
help and quick reply.
Julia Lawall wrote:
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011, Håkon Løvdal wrote:
On 21 January 2011 23:38, Philipp Kutin <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to do my first steps with Coccinelle but can't get the following
to work: basically, for debugging, I want to implement a poor man's array
bound check by doing something like
@@
expression E;
@@
- sprite[E]
+ sprite[{( int tmp=E; (tmp<0 ? (*(int*)123=234) : tmp) )}]
Could you not wrap that construct inside a pre-processor macro? I.e.
- sprite[E]
+ sprite[ARRAY_BOUND_CHECK(E)]
As a bonus, I think that also would improve readability.
Indeed, that looks like a much better solution. I will add , anyway. It
will be treated just like any other binary operator, ie no notion of
ordering between the arguments.
julia
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.diku.dk/mailman/listinfo/cocci
(Web access from inside DIKUs LAN only)
