> I'm trying to match the cases where the return value from the
> function bar() isn't used in any way.

I asked also for this feature in my request "Detection of ignored function
return values".
http://lists.diku.dk/pipermail/cocci/2010-February/000690.html

I find that it is still an open issue because I see a need for the extension of
the semantic patch language for this purpose.
http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/docs/main_grammar002.html#metadecl

Do I read the SmPL grammar correctly if a function return type is not listed for
the types of meta-variables?

Would you like to extended this list for the support of more constructs from a
programming language like C?

Regards,
Markus
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.diku.dk/mailman/listinfo/cocci
(Web access from inside DIKUs LAN only)

Reply via email to