On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > > I really think you should try to do what you want, and then come back with > > some concrete code that is or is not satisfactory. > > Would you like to apply a semantic patch on your own source file > "spatch_linux.c" that deals with calls of the functions "printf" and "execvp"? > ;-) > https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/blob/0708f913629519b5dbc99f68b6f3ea5ab068230c/tools/distributed/spatch_linux.c#L30
I'm not sure what you are proposing here, but I don't care very much about the robustness of this code. > Is the version of this file still relevant for your source code transformation > tool? I use it all the time, but no one else is obliged to. There was a posting a few months ago of a simpler solution for parallelizing runs of coccinelle. julia _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] http://lists.diku.dk/mailman/listinfo/cocci (Web access from inside DIKUs LAN only)
