On 02.02.2011 09:58, Julia Lawall wrote:
> I think that all you want is the ability to specify a function like;
>
> \(foo\|xxx\|yyy\)(...) {
I stumbled across the inability to use alternatives for function names
in exact this example pretty early. So...
> <...
> - alpha()
> + beta()
> ...>
> }
>
> This could (moderately) easily be added. Currently, you would have to
> have separate rules fo foo, xxx, and yyy, which is a bit awkward.
...at least I do want that feature, yes. :)
Regards,
Mathias
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.diku.dk/mailman/listinfo/cocci
(Web access from inside DIKUs LAN only)
