> OK, you can print the name if you like. Have we got another bit of consensus?
Can a function body be found by a SmPL pattern without use of a meta-variable which would identify the enclosing function? > But if you make a transformation you get a patch, and the patch usually has > the name of the affected > function in it. I would prefer to be precise here. - I hope that you mean primarily that the function where the error handling is incomplete is "affected". Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] http://lists.diku.dk/mailman/listinfo/cocci (Web access from inside DIKUs LAN only)
