2011/2/6 SF Markus Elfring <[email protected]>:
>> What would be the practical purpose of such addition?
>> Do you have any example (forseen SmPL file + C source file)?
>
> How do you think about feature requests like the following?
> - Support for look-around in regular expressions
> http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=4872
>
> - Support for alternation and negative lookbehind assertions broken?
> http://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-5004
I think you really miss my point.
I **personnally** think that the example you give are not practical
example for **coccinelle**.
The two examples you gave:
1) Do not contain C source file + SmPL
which was the question I was asking.
2) Moreover
http://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-5004
--> "QRegExp doesn't support this. There's a task somewhere
asking for support to be added."
then seeking for the appropriate task I found:
http://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-2371
--> Priority: P4: Low
Resolution: Unresolved
Fix Version/s: Some future release
concerning:
http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=4872
Reproducibility: have not tried
Date Submitted: 2009-09-22 21:12
Last Update: 2009-09-22 21:12
So the first may not be implemented any time soon and second
is more than a year old without further activity beside the initial.
I am an almost silent and pleased listener of this list because:
- I am quite pleased with current coccinelle feature
- I learn a lot simply reading **practical examples** from others
- I find Julia and others responsivness very good and don't to
abuse of their time.
Now speaking **only for myself**, I found some of your e-mail not precise enough
to be useful so I break my silence.
Now I will certainly return to my silence and won't bother you again.
--
Erk
Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » -
http://www.april.org
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.diku.dk/mailman/listinfo/cocci
(Web access from inside DIKUs LAN only)
