On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, Jani Monoses wrote:
> On 02/12/2011 07:49 AM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Håkon Løvdal wrote:
> >
> > > > From the main_grammar.pdf there is an example of adding static
> > > in front of a function. However trying to add something other than
> > > the phrase "static" does not work. Is this by design?
> > >
> > > $ cat main.c
> > >
> > > int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
> > > return 0;
> >> }
> > >
> > > $ cat add_before_function_001.cocci
> >> @@
> > > type T;
> > > identifier func;
> >> @@
> > >
> > > + static
> > > T func(...) { ... }
> > >
> > > $ cat add_before_function_002.cocci
> >> @@
> > > type T;
> > > identifier func;
> >> @@
> > >
> > > + STATIC
> > > T func(...) { ... }
> >
> > Coccinelle parses the before and after code, so there is no way it can
> > parse that.
>
> Would a --force or similar option be easy to implement? In effect it would not
> try to parse the after code, and allow transforming the code in way it is not
> guaranteed to be standard C anymore but which would help with yet
> unimplemented compiler extensions or other 3rd party tools that use unusual
> annotations.
It might be possible, but I'm not sure it would be very easy to implement.
I think think about it.
julia
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.diku.dk/mailman/listinfo/cocci
(Web access from inside DIKUs LAN only)
