On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 8:35 AM, SF Markus Elfring <[email protected]> wrote: >> No. > > I imagine that your tool can benefit from distribution of tasks to various > threads more than it might lose because of synchronisation costs for > parallelisation. > How are the chances to reuse any thread pool implementation?
What are the chances that you learn OCaml, send some patches, and get a thread pool implementation working? "Ideas, everybody has ideas. What matters is execution." mark Z. PS: http://mirror.ocamlcore.org/ocaml-tutorial.org/index.html PS2: ocaml threads are not parallel, so one has actually to use fork to benefit from multiple CPUs. > > Regards, > Markus > _______________________________________________ > Cocci mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.diku.dk/mailman/listinfo/cocci > (Web access from inside DIKUs LAN only) > _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] http://lists.diku.dk/mailman/listinfo/cocci (Web access from inside DIKUs LAN only)
