On Tue, 24 May 2011, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > > But as I mentioned in another mail, EBNF is just NOT the way to go in > > order to get people to begin to use Coccinelle on a larger scale -- > > people who read and _write_ C are orders of magnitude more numerous > > than people who can read EBNF - let alone write it. > > Would you like to include any syntax diagrams in your documentation approach? > > http://www-cgi.uni-regensburg.de/~brf09510/syntax.html > http://karmin.ch/ebnf/index > http://dotnet.jku.at/applications/Visualizer/ > http://www.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/~thiemann/haskell/ebnf2ps/
Not especially. Our grammar is written in LaTeX, so it would be painful to convert it to that format. We could take the raw yacc file, but some simplifications have been made to make the grammar more "useful". julia _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] http://lists.diku.dk/mailman/listinfo/cocci (Web access from inside DIKUs LAN only)
