On Thu, 25 Aug 2011, Arie Middelkoop wrote: > >> In SmPL pseudo > >> (and invalid) code I'm looking for something that does: > >> @@ > >> macro interface; > >> @@ > >> - interface > >> + struct > >> > >> Just using perl (interface is a very common word in the comments) or > >> removing/modifying the define (it is used in macro expansion (API) as > >> well in generated code from IDL) is very tedious and I wonder if there > >> is a cleaner way to achieve it; preferably in coccinelle. > > > > I'm not seeing anything very obvious. The problem is that the SmPL code > > doesn't take into account the macro definition file. So it won't know > > what to do with interface. > > What if you could define an additional set of keywords and for each keyword a > mapping to a sequence of tokens? > In that case, you can perform such substitutions before the actual parse > process starts. This would work for your particular problem: but it's rather > early in the entire process to be really useful. > (not to mention that I'm not sure if it is possible to 'dynamically' extend > the lexer)
This is what is done for the C code. But it is not done for the SmPL code. julia _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] http://lists.diku.dk/mailman/listinfo/cocci (Web access from inside DIKUs LAN only)
