On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
when != switch (<+...y...+>) { case ... : ... }
Is the shown constraint specification the shortest one for this
conditional
statement that is possible in the context of the semantic patch language?
It's not possible just to put ... ?
Thanks for this explanation.
Is it eventually needed to consider the pattern that the key word "default"
is used without a case label before?
If you put switch (...) { ... } it shouldn't matter about case or default.
julia
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.diku.dk/mailman/listinfo/cocci
(Web access from inside DIKUs LAN only)