Hello Julia,
On 01/28/2013 11:04 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jan 2013, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
>
>> Hello Peter,
>>
>> On 01/26/2013 02:28 AM, Peter Senna Tschudin wrote:
>>> Thank you for testing.
>>>
>>> I made changes on the semantic patch. I believe it fixed the problem.
>>> Can you test it?
>> while it does fix the issue it makes the cocci script less readable and
>> works only in that particular case. Not sure it is worth the effort as
>> the bad generated patch can be trivially detected and easily fixed
>> manually. My email was more of a bug report / feature request for
>> coccinelle than an improvement request to the script.
>>
>> Though I've noticed an other issue with the script: Any reason you use
>> "Options: --no-includes"? While it does speed up things it misses quite
>> a few cases as a lot of types are defined in the headers.
>
> I think it should be --all-includes or even --recursive-includes
no clue what the policy in the Kernel is but --recursive-includes is
quite heavy handed as a default. I have one --recursive-includes still
running for Wine and it accumulated until now over 1126 CPU minutes
(Intel i5 mobile CPU with 2.4 GHz). It found 5 more cases while
--no-includes found 11 and --local-includes additional 32. The
--local-includes finished in less than 30 minutes (didn't time it exactly).
bye
michael
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
