Hello,
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 18:18 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
> On Tue, 19 Mar 2013, Eric Leblond wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've got the following construction in a code:
> > typedef struct Packet_ {
> > struct Flow_ * flow;
> > } Packet;
> > and in an other include file:
> > typedef struct Flow_ {
> > ...
> > } Flow;
> >
> > My problem here is that if p is a Packet then p->flow is a Flow at least
> > from a developer point of view. But coccinelle is not detecting the
> > match "Flow f" do not match on a "p->flow".
> >
> > I've thought about adding a new isomorphism to solve this but I don't
> > like the idea...
> >
> > How could I fix this issue ?
>
> --all-includes?
>
> I thik the type inferencer should be aware of typedefs, if it sees the
> definition.
Thanks a lot for your answer but it does not work.
I've added a direct inclusion of file definition in my source file to be
sure include containing definitions will be found by coccinelle.
When adding --recurse-includes and/or --all-includes it is able to find
that p->flow is a "struct Flow_ *" but it does not inference it as a
Flow:
Running: spatch --recursive-includes --all-includes -sp_file
/tmp/tmpQ678Iv.cocci detect-engine-tag.c.
init_defs_builtins: /usr/share/coccinelle/standard.h
HANDLING: detect-engine-tag.c
detect-engine-tag.c:241 (Flow *f): if (f->tag_list == NULL)
detect-engine-tag.c:246 (Flow *f): DetectTagDataEntry *iter = f->tag_list;
with /tmp/tmpQ678Iv.cocci being
@init@
Flow *p;
Flow ps;
position p1;
@@
(
p@p1->tag_list
|
[email protected]_list
)
@Some python code to print p1@
If I look for "struct Flow_" (simple substitution in the @init@), I've
got:
Running: spatch --recursive-includes --all-includes -sp_file
/tmp/tmpmSk2Cm.cocci detect-engine-tag.c.
init_defs_builtins: /usr/share/coccinelle/standard.h
HANDLING: detect-engine-tag.c
detect-engine-tag.c:121 (struct Flow_ *p->flow): if (p->flow->tag_list !=
NULL) {
detect-engine-tag.c:122 (struct Flow_ *p->flow): iter =
p->flow->tag_list;
with p being a Packet. So the definition of Packet has been found.
I've been trying this latest coccinelle git.
BR,
--
Eric Leblond <[email protected]>
Blog: https://home.regit.org/
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci