> > You could have a separate rule for this case, but then there is still the > > case where there are two nested ifs, etc. > > Right, hence why I'd really like coccinelle's control-flow handling to > handle the case above. I do want to match "return;" at the logical end > of the function, in a control-flow sense, *without* taking into account > that the "return;" itself is the logical end of the function in a > control-flow sense, because I can't remove it unless the point it > appears at would already be the logical end of the function.
I don't see a solution for this case... julia _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
