On Thu, 28 Aug 2014, Francois BERENGER wrote:

> On 08/28/2014 04:16 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Aug 2014, Francois BERENGER wrote:
> > 
> > > I think the uninstall target can be made much simpler and robust.
> > 
> > Could you explain?  I am not at all familiar with the code.
> 
> Rather than removing things one by one in [...]/share/coccinelle/*
> you can remove directly [...]/share/coccinelle .
> 
> This is more robust since some of the things in [...]/share/coccinelle/*
> are not installed by all make targets but were nonetheless listed
> by the uninstall target (which would fail with an exit 1, which is a problem
> when you package things for opam).

OK, what worries me is that what you suggest seems rather obvious, but I 
don't know why it was not originally done that way.  I will try to find 
out.

julia
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci

Reply via email to