On Wed, 8 Oct 2014, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > > @@ > > identifier other_functions; > > @@ > > > > ( > > \(function\|names\|that\|are\|of\|no\|interest\) > > | > > * other_functions > > ) > > (...) > > Thanks for another example of a semantic patch rule. > > Would any more fine-tuning make sense for the shown SmPL disjunction when it > gets longer? > Does the current Coccinelle software support to organise entries in such a > name > list into subgroups where common prefixes or suffixes will be used?
No. julia > Your suggestion comes close to my idea to work with the functionality > "negative > lookaround" (in constraints) for some use cases. > http://www.regular-expressions.info/lookaround.html > > Regards, > Markus > _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
