>> @Add_before_implementation@ >> identifier func; >> type t; >> @@ >> ( >> #define func BAR(func) >> t func(...) >> { ... } >> | >> +#define func BAR(func) >> t func(...) >> { ... } >> ) > > This doesn't work.
Interesting ... > There is no kind of disjunction that includes a function definition in a > branch. Was I too optimistic that my suggestion with the specification of SmPL alternatives should also work? Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci