> I suggest to reconsider this situation once more. I have looked at my script "list_functions_with_single_function_call5.cocci" again.
> * It can be that I got stuck somehow in this application variant as the > number of relevant rules grew. It seems that I made a bit progress in a better direction. Now I stumble on the next detail problem if I try to design the needed SmPL rules for more specific source code. * How can it be excluded with the semantic patch language to match non-pointer data types with the metavariable type "type?" * Which is the best way to distinguish non-pointer types from pointer data types with metavariables? Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
