> I guess it could become a parsing problem by just considering > the second const to be a comment.
Would you like to reconsider consequences from a C99 rule like "6.7.3/4"? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5781222/duplicate-const-qualifier-allowed-in-c-but-not-in-c Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
