On Sun, 19 Jul 2015, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > > typedef int mytype; > > > > mytype x; > > > > Clearly this would not be the same as > > > > typedef int x; > > I see a bit more here. > > But my knowledge in the application of the semantic patch language > is still evolving also around such details. The corresponding distinction > is not clear enough for me so far. > > Is the handling of "typedefs" another detail for later considerations?
I just mentioned typedefs to make clear the difference between the name of a type and the type of a variable. julia > >> I am still unfamiliar with the consequences from the use of > >> variables like "v" and "x" when they are not position variables > >> as you suggest in your example script. > > > > They match the closest enclosing expression. > > I see that there are also a few other items mentioned in the manual. > Unfortunately, the description is terse. > https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/blob/af8131522ee9aff575e4345f5068f4f138264cd6/docs/manual/cocci_syntax.tex#L258 > > But I am unsure about when this special SmPL construct will help > in the discussed use case. > > Regards, > Markus > _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
