On Thursday 2015-10-22 12:32, SF Markus Elfring wrote: >> 1. Running `aclocal; autoconf` is not enough. I spot a Makefile.am >> in the source tree, so you more or less need `autoreconf -fi` >> instead in the "autogen" script. > >Are you interested in achieving progress on a topic like >'Collateral evolution around "Automake"'? >https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/issues/41
Sort of. >> there is no need for coccinelle.spec to run autogen. > >Have you got any concerns for the dependency on such a pregenerated script >together with the discussed distribution package? If a tarball ships configure, good for us. If it does not, well, then that means it will take a few seconds more to build and extra dependencies to be installed. For a build system, all of that is a no-brainer, but for "users", it can get annoying when they have to install, for example, half of the gnome-devel stack just to satisfy an m4 macro in case they have to rerun the configure generator. _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
