>> Would this SmPL script variant need any further fine-tuning
>> (or other software extensions)?
> 
> I have no idea what the above does.  The previous proposed variants were
> completely fine.

* I suggest in principle once more to try regular expression out
  for SmPL constraints on data types and corresponding names of member 
functions.

* The desired function initialisation can be a bit generalised, can't it?

Is such an approach also useful for the requested use case?

Regards,
Markus
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci

Reply via email to