On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 7:44 AM, Olaf Hering <o...@aepfle.de> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > >> cherry picks for fixes or huge interest to keep it compatible with latest >> compilers qemu-xen-traditional seems to be more of a liability than a > > Hey, this is about gnutls, not gcc!
Actually no, I also had backported another fix which I submitted part of this series, and it is present as of this release: mcgrof@ergon ~/devel/qemu (git::master)$ git describe --contains 98d23704138e0be17a3ed9eb2631077bf92cc028 v1.1-rc0~785 How are fixes of interested backported regularly for this to make it reasonable to at least keep this as a viable option which at least compiles? Only compiling is one thing, how are security fixes backported proactively? Luis _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
