> I guess that is a valid optimization. But does this go through the > parsing step? And even if, why doesn't mine?
Would you like to try the following SmPL approach once more?
@prototype_adjustment@
identifier F, I;
type R, T;
@@
R F(...,
- const
T I,
...
);
Regards,
Markus
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
