> This perhaps is not the best demo for use of ++ but it > should suffice.
Since which release of the Coccinelle software is this notation (double plus) supported? > This adds some basic documentation for it and a demo. Thanks for your approach. > @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ > +/* > + * This can move unused variables declaration and assignment Will it be better to refer to "variable declaration"? > + * which is only used in the branch into the branch. Its Can this wording be confusing? > + * resticted however to only apply to code where this happens Is the word "restricted" appropriate here? > + * doe snot matter. Would you like to move a space character here? > + * If you don't use "++" you'll get "already tagged token" error since Would the addition of a comma (before "you'll") make sense here? > +You may run into the situation where grammar you specificy for Is such a wording confusing? Will the word "specify" be more appropriate in this context? > +additions. If you are sure that order does not matter you can use the Would the addition of a comma (before "you") help in reading? > +If however you have two consecutive tokens that Coccinelle > +can transform order cannot be guaranteed for how Coccinelle How do you think about "… transform, order …"? Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
