> I can do this by depends on foo1 || foo2 || foo3|| foo4,
> etc however since I have a lot of rules

How many condition elements have you got in mind for your use case?

Does the mentioned SmPL dependency specification become inconvenient (or
challenging) occasionally?


> I was hoping I could condense these into one.

Would you like to construct dependencies by special scripts?


> This is just to reduce a long list of conjunctions to a much simpler set.

Are you eventually looking for the support of another metavariable type
in the semantic patch language?

Regards,
Markus
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci

Reply via email to