> (
> ex1 = action(...);
> ex2 = <+...ex1...+>;
> |
> *ex1 = action(...);
>  ex2 = value;
> )
> 
> is perhaps what you are looking for.

I would prefer an approach where the expressions “ex1” and “value” could be 
compared
somehow directly instead of matching an unwanted branch in a SmPL disjunction.

Regards,
Markus
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci

Reply via email to