On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Julia Lawall <julia.law...@lip6.fr> wrote: > > > On Fri, 18 Aug 2017, Kees Cook wrote: > >> I'd like to have a rule that would match both: >> >> function(ptr); >> ptr->field = 7; >> >> and >> >> function(&obj); >> obj.field = 7; >> >> to produce: >> >> new_function(ptr, 7); >> >> and >> >> new_function(&obj, 7); >> >> respectively. The internal isomorphisms don't seem to cover this? Or >> I'm maybe doing something wrong? > > There is no isomorphism for that. Perhaps you cold live with the > following? > > @@ > expression x,e; > @@ > > -f > +g > ( \(&x\|x\) > +, e > ); > - \(x.field\|x->field\) = e;
Ah, perfect, thanks! -Kees -- Kees Cook Pixel Security _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
