> As I commented to you, some of it is a bit more in the class of good
> enhancements
> so whatever I haven't changed now that resonated with me,
I find that some information could be better integrated already now.
> I'll pick up later if the general idea is accepted.
I am curious on how the waiting queue for remaining improvement possibilities
will be managed for this evolving software tool.
> Sorry if this was confusing.
I would appreciate a corresponding issue ordering somehow.
> Thanks for all the careful comments and suggestions!
Now I would like to add another development concern.
I find source code places like the following suspicious in the script
“scripts/runchecks”
because the passed variable contents might need extra care.
…
+ def RegexFilter(self, line, verbose):
…
+ r = "^(.*:\d+:)\s(\w+:)\s(%s.*)$" % regex[0]
…
+ def Postprocess(self):
…
+ self.cmdvec.append("-Wno-%s" % self.sparse_name(e))
…
Regards,
Markus
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
